Simple counting loops
Let's start with a simple loop that counts to 10.
Now let's refine this example to better understand Fuzion's powerful loop statement. Many loops have an index field that is initialized during the first loop iteration and updated after each iteration. Index fields are defined in a for clause that can give an initial value and, after a comma, an expression to calculate the value for the next iteration. In our loop example, we define i as an index field as follows:
Oops, this code does not compile: We forgot to remove the code that updates the
i. In Fuzion, index fields are not modifiable outside
of the for-clause of the loop. The corrected example:
Not modifying the index field has an enormous advantage: The field is an immutable field within the loop body, which allows for compiler optimizations and for cheap accesses within closures, even accesses from other threads are automatically safe.
The loop termination condition that so far was given in the
part can be omitted to create an endless loop, as shown in the next example:
An endless loop is typically not very useful, the main exception being the control loop in a task that is supposed to continue forever.
However, as we will see next, iterating loops that operate over a finite stream of elements do not need an explicit termination condition, which will be shown in the following examples.
Using a simple iterating loop enables us to further simplify the code of the previously presented counting loop by iterating over an interval:
What happens here is logically different from the previous loops: The expression
1..10calls the feature
infix ..on the integer constant
1with the argument
10. This feature defines an interval from the value it is called on to the value passed as an argument. So, in this case, this defines an interval from 1 to 10, inclusive.
An interval is streamable, which means that that it can be used to define a loop
index field using
What this means is that the previous example uses syntactic sugar that the compiler expands to something like the following
This looks as if the code could be significantly slower to run than the simple index field in the earlier examples. However, the compiler's optimization will result in code that is almost identical.
The ability to loop over arbitrary streams of indices enables as well to loop
over integers using a step size larger than 1. Here is an example that prints
only even numbers by using a step of
This loop is essentially the same as the previous loop, only that the interval
that the loop iterates over now was created using a step size, which is done
using the operator
infix : on an integer interval.
⮫ next: Advanced Loops